MRJCON Teaching /Learning Program Assessment Rubric

Part I: AP Team

MRJCON Academic Programs will collect the exemplar assignment and associated grading criteria, identify, and record an aggregate score of the exemplar data source.

 
Program   
AACN Domain/Competency   
MRJCON PLO #  
Linked Course CLO #  
Linked Course Exemplar  
Established Threshold/ Benchmark

Acceptable level of student performance on the assessment: 

Acceptable aggregated percentage of students reaching level:
Data Collection Method All student exemplar records from all sections of NRSG xxx were included in the data collection [Canvas/ D2L course shells] 
Benchmark score     % of students that met the established threshold (aggregate)
Was the Assessment Benchmark Met? Yes / No

 

 
Section # 
# of Students 
Range
Results 
NRSG XXX_XXX_202350
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

 

Part II: Faculty Reviewers

Directions: The independent faculty reviewers will assess aggregated benchmark exemplar source data score, exemplar assignment, and grading criteria for its alignment with the program assessment plan and make recommendations as indicated using the following rubric: 

 
Assessment Alignment Criteria
7-8 points
5-6 points
3-4 points
0-2 points
Criteria Score

Relevance/Utility

[important/ value]
The exemplar provides significant value to the MRJCON assessment process
The exemplar provides moderate value to the MRJCON assessment process
The exemplar provides low value to the MRJCON assessment process
The exemplar provides no value to the MRJCON assessment process
___ / 8 

Ethics

[proper, fair, legal, right, or just]
The exemplar is proper, fair, legal, right, and just in the assessment process.
The exemplar meets 4 of 5 propriety indicators (proper, fair, legal, right, and just) in the assessment process.
The exemplar meets 3 of 5 propriety indicators (proper, fair, legal, right, and just) in the assessment process.
The exemplar meets < 3 of the 5 propriety indicators (proper, fair, legal, right, and just) in the assessment process.
___ / 8 

Rigor

[reliable, appropriate methods]
The exemplar provides significant rigor to the MRJCON assessment process
The exemplar provides moderate rigor to the MRJCON assessment process
The exemplar provides low rigor to the MRJCON assessment process
The exemplar provides no rigor to the MRJCON assessment process
___ / 8 

Independence/Objectivity

[professional judgment, impartiality]
The exemplar provides significant impartiality to the MRJCON assessment process
The exemplar provides moderate impartiality to the MRJCON assessment process
The exemplar provides low impartiality to the MRJCON assessment process
The exemplar provides no impartiality to the MRJCON assessment process
___ / 8 

Transparency

[accountability]
The exemplar provides significant accountability to the MRJCON assessment process
The exemplar provides moderate accountability to the MRJCON assessment process
The exemplar provides low accountability to the MRJCON assessment process
The exemplar provides no accountability to the MRJCON assessment process
___ / 8 
 

Total Assessment Alignment Score: ___ / 40 

At a minimum, if total alignment score is < 30 or an individual alignment criterion is < 6, provide comment and recommendations for improvement. (Document all that apply). 

  1. Gather additional data to verify or refute the findings
  2. Identify potential curriculum changes to address the problem
  3. Change the acceptable performance threshold.
  4. Choose a different assignment to assess the outcome
  5. Evaluate the exemplar/artifact rubric to assure outcomes meet student skill level
  6. Use Bloom’s Taxonomy to consider stronger learning outcomes
  7. Other, describe: 

 

Reviewer:  _______________________ Date ______________

Reviewer:  _______________________ Date ______________

Notes/Recommendations:

 

 

 

Part III: UAAC/GAAC  

Close the Feedback Loop (UAAC/GAAC Decision):